U.S. Collections West Inc or USCW is a debt collection agency which receives a lot of consumer complaints to our law firm for debt harassment. Find out who they are, why they might be calling, and how you can stop them.
What is U.S. Collections West?
U.S. Collections West , Inc. (USCW) is a third-party collection agency based in Arizona. USCW has received consumer complaints alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), including illegal communication tactics and misrepresentation. If you have been contacted by USCW, make sure you understand your rights before responding.
Have questions? Call us now at 475-277-1600 for a Free Case Evaluation.
Our services are absolutely FREE to you.
The harassing company pays our fees.
Is U.S. Collections West a scam?
They’re legit. According to the Better Business Bureau (BBB), U.S. Collections West is a legitimate collection agency, founded and incorporated in 1986. The BBB opened its file in 1988. USCW is listed as a collection agency and has a secondary website located at www.ethicalaz.com/uscollectionswestinc. Buzzfile estimates USCW’s annual revenue at $4.4 million and the size of its staff at 42 people.
According to its primary website at www.uscollectionswest.com, USCW “incorporates innovation and experience to produce the leading percentiles for our customers.” USCW collects “all types of debt” and does not specify or limit the industries it serves. Their collection services include civil debt litigation, pre-collect service, credit reporting, consumer online payment solutions, and online client login.
Who does U.S. Collections West collect for?
U.S. Collections West collection staff accepts accounts on a contingency basis and also purchases debt. Their contingency rates are based on the age of the account; the account balance; the volume of accounts placed; and the type of account with regard to its “collect-ability.” USCW pays court costs and attorney fees for litigated claims up front. Pre-collect services include standard per-letter rates for litigated and non-litigated accounts. USCW offers several options for clients interested in assigning accounts for collection.
The USCW website contains a client service guarantee, but no references or links to consumer protection resources, laws, or agencies. There is also no information about USCW’s compliance policies or employee training.
Who are we? We are Lemberg Law, a Consumer Law Firm
Lemberg Law is a consumer law firm helping victims of collection harassment and abuse. We are ranked A+ by the BBB. We’ve helped more than 15,000 consumers stop harassment and recover money from debt collectors. Harassed? Abused? Misled by a collector? Call our Helpline today! There is no charge unless we win.
How many complaints are there against U.S. Collections West – USCW?
The BBB has closed 23 complaints against USCW in the past three years, with 9 complaints closed in the past 12 months. Almost all of those complaints allege problems with billing and collection. Since April 2015, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has closed 33 complaints against USCW. Justia lists 6 cases of civil litigation naming USCW as a defendant.
Can U.S. Collections West Sue Me or Garnish My Wages?
It is illegal for a debt collector to make empty threats to sue you or garnish your wages. It is also unlikely USCW would sue you for a debt you may not owe or they cannot validate. However, debt collection agencies are known to have summoned debtors to court and garnish wages after a default judgement. Contacting an attorney BEFORE this could possibly happen would be a smart move. We’ve helped thousands of consumers fight back against unscrupulous debt collection harassers. Find out if we can help you too today!
In June 1998, in United States District Court for the District of Arizona, a judge issued a Memorandum and Order in a case alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA). In this case, the plaintiff had rented an apartment in 1995 and later defaulted on the lease. The property manager for the apartment complex obtained a judgment against the plaintiff and assigned it to U.S. Collections Westfor collection. In 1996, USCW mailed the plaintiff four letters, each attempting to collect a different amount. Later in 1996, USCW filed an Application for Writ of Garnishment of the plaintiff’s earnings with an assignment to the property management company in the amount of $832.80. The amount of the judgment in the writ entered by Scottsdale Justice Court was $702.77. The USCW representative who applied for the writ was not an attorney.
The plaintiff cited violations of the FDCPA on four counts:
1. The difference in the amount of the debt stated in the assignment and the writ constituted a violation of the FDCPA’s prohibition against “falsely representing the amount of a debt in order to collect a debt.” 2. The non-attorney USCW representative’s signing of the application for writ of garnishment violated the FDCPA’s prohibition against using “any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt,” because such actions can only be taken by an attorney. 3. The act of filing the application for the writ of garnishment constituted a violation of the FDCPA’s prohibition against threatening to take actions that cannot legally be taken. 4. USCW’s actions constituted actions intended to “harass, oppress, or abuse” a debtor.
USCW argued that its violation on count 1 should be excused on the basis of the “bona fide error” defense because it relied on the figures supplied by the property manager. The court disagreed, because the “bona fide error” defense only works when the accused can prove that they had a process in place to prevent the error and used it. The court found in favor of the plaintiff on count 2, citing the Arizona Supreme Court’s broad definition of “practice of law,” and the requirement that practitioners be registered with the Arizona State Bar. USCW attempted to argue it was not guilty on count 3 because they did not threaten to take actions they could not legally take; they actually took the action. The court disagreed and found for the plaintiff. However, the court found that the plaintiff had not carried the burden of proof showing an intent to “harass, oppress, or abuse,” so left that issue for a jury to decide.
U.S. Collections West Calling You?
Federal laws protect you. The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) regulates the behavior of collection agencies by prohibiting actions such as the use of abusive or threatening language; harassment; or the use of false or misleading information to collect a debt. The FCRA regulates how collection agencies and creditors report delinquent debts to credit reporting agencies. Additional consumer protection laws include the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA).
Can I sue U.S. Collections West for harassment?
Yes. If you want to enforce your rights, or recover money for violations — you need to sue. Federal laws provide individuals like you with a means to seek monetary damages in court. For example, the FDCPA allows consumers who have been violated to recover damages of up to $1,000, plus attorney fees and court costs.
“With your help the nagging collection calls have ceased! I was thrilled I was also able to get damages from the collection agency. I am unable to adequately express my joy. I am so thankful I made the call.”
“I would recommend your company to anyone. You have the debt collectors off my back, and I will finally see the light at the end of the tunnel. Throughout the entire procedure your employees were courteous and professional. I was blown away by their efficacy also.
“After speaking to one of the partners, and going over the plan of action, I felt I’d chose the perfect company to go to work for me. He was very accommodating in describing what was going to happen. I would strongly recommend Lemberg Law to anybody being hassled by debt collectors”
Can You Help Me Delete U.S. Collections West USCW from My Credit Report?
Chances are good that we can help. Call us today and we’ll explain.
Share your story
Have you had a bad experience with this agency’s debt collectors? Sound off and share your experience with other visitors in the comment box below.
About the Author:
Sergei Lemberg is a lawyer whose practice focuses on consumer law, class actions and personal injury litigation. He has been repeatedly recognized as the “most active consumer attorney” in the country. In 2020, Mr. Lemberg represented Noah Duguid in the United States Supreme Court in the case entitled Duguid v. Facebook. He is the author of Defanging Debt Collectors, a book that teaches consumers how to battle debt collectors and win.