Valentine & Kebartas Inc or V&K is a debt collection agency which receives a lot of consumer complaints to our law firm for debt harassment. Find out who they are, why they might be calling, and how you can stop them.
What is Valentine & Kebartas?
Valentine & Kebartas Inc or V&K is a third-party collection agency based in Massachusetts. V&K has received consumer complaints alleging serious violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA), including illegal communication tactics and misrepresentation. If you have been contacted by V&K, understand your rights before taking action.
Have questions? Call us now at 475-277-1600 for a Free Case Evaluation.
Our services are absolutely FREE to you.
The harassing company pays our fees.
Is Valentine & Kebartas a scam?
They’re legit. According to the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Valentine & Kebartas, LLC is a legitimate collection agency, founded in 1994 and incorporated locally in Lawrence, MA in 2015. The BBB opened its file in 2005. V&K is listed as a collection agency with a total staff of 400 people. Buzzfile lists V&K’s founding as 2015, the year of their incorporation, and estimates their annual revenue at $6 million and the size of their headquarters staff at 145 people.
Who does Valentine & Kebartas collect for?
According to its website, V&K has offices in Massachusetts, Idaho, Florida, and Panama. They offer full-service third-party collection services to lenders and service providers from a variety of industries, including bank card lenders; retail lenders and merchants; telecommunications companies; education institutes; utility companies; commercial leasing companies; insurance providers; and government agencies.
Their collection services include several different specializations. Their pre-collection program is for “accounts that are past-due but not ready to be placed for third-party collection.” Their third-party division employs agents who collect delinquent debt using initial data scrub and scoring; telephone campaigns; collection letters; credit reporting; and skip tracing. Their “near shore collections” division employs a staff in their office in Panama that allows them to use “the best of American management, systems, and processes with the advantages of [a …call center in Panama [where] Panamanian economics allow us to afford high caliber collectors…with analytical skills that allow them to effectively handle complex collection scenarios.”
Their associations page lists over a dozen professional affiliations. Consumer resources and references to consumer protection laws and agencies can only be found by clicking the Frequently Asked Questions link on the home page.
Who are we? We are Lemberg Law, a Consumer Law Firm
Lemberg Law is a consumer law firm helping victims of collection harassment and abuse. We are ranked A+ by the BBB. We’ve helped more than 15,000 consumers stop harassment and recover money from debt collectors. Harassed? Abused? Misled by a collector? Call our Helpline today! There is no charge unless we win.
How many complaints are there against Valentine & Kebartas – V&K?
The BBB has closed 12 complaints against Valentine & Kebartas in the past three years, with 3 closed in the past 12 months. Most of these complaints allege problems with billing and collections. Since March 2015, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has closed 26 complaints against V&K. Justia lists at least 9 cases of civil litigation involving Valentine & Kebartas.
Can Valentine & Kebartas Sue Me or Garnish My Wages?
It is illegal for a debt collector to make empty threats to sue you or garnish your wages. It is also unlikely V&K would sue you for a debt you may not owe or they cannot validate. However, debt collection agencies are known to have summoned debtors to court and garnish wages after a default judgement. Contacting an attorney BEFORE this could possibly happen would be a smart move. We’ve helped thousands of consumers fight back against unscrupulous debt collection harassers. Find out if we can help you too today!
Many of the complaints filed against V&K with the CFPB indicate problems with communication tactics. In June 2017, a judge in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia issued a dissenting opinion in a case in which a plaintiff had initially prevailed in a complaint alleging V&K had violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by making an excessive number of phone calls in their effort to collect a debt. The majority of the Supreme Court on appeal reversed the trial jury’s findings that V&K’s conduct in this case represented a violation of FDCPA Section 1692d(5) and the West Virginia Consumer Credit Protection Act (WVCCPA) Sections 46A-2-122-129a.
Specifically, the WVCCPA provides that:
“No debt collector shall unreasonably oppress or abuse any person in connection with the collection of or attempt to collect any claim alleged to be due and owing by that personor another. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is deemed to violate this section:
…(d) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously, or at unusual times or at times known to be inconvenient, with intent to annoy, abuse, oppress or threaten any person at the called number.”
Similarly, the FDCPA prohibits “causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.” Initially, the trial court in this case found that V&K “had caused [the plaintiff’s] telephone to ring 252 times over an eight-month period,” and “that after an initial two-week period of reasonable attempts to contact respondent, the petitioner immediately thereafter ‘ramped up its collection campaign,’ by placing after an initial 22 unanswered calls, ‘6 [more] calls with three separated by less than an hour. The next day…five additional calls…with as little as twenty-eight (28) minutes separating calls. None of these calls were answered. And on the third day six calls…with some…separated by only thirty-two (32) minutes.’”
The trial court found that the volume and frequency of collection calls was sufficient to prove intent on the part of V&K to “annoy, abuse or harass” the plaintiff. The appeal overturned this decision, and the dissenting judge cited case law to support his opinion that the decision to overturn represented a “complete departure from the overwhelming consensus of courts addressing this issue” which he therefore regards as “entirely unsupported by the majority’s scant and illogical analysis.”
Valentine & Kebartas V&K Calling You?
Federal laws protect you. The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) regulates the behavior of collection agencies by prohibiting actions such as the use of abusive or threatening language; harassment; or the use of false or misleading information to collect a debt. The FCRA regulates how collection agencies and creditors report delinquent debts to credit reporting agencies. Additional consumer protection laws include the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA).
Can I sue V&K for harassment?
Yes. If you want to enforce your rights, or recover money for violations — you need to sue. Federal laws provide individuals like you with a means to seek monetary damages in court. For example, the FDCPA allows consumers who have been violated to recover damages of up to $1,000, plus attorney fees and court costs.
“I was so excited when you told me about the positive outcome of the lawsuit. If the need ever arises again, I will not hesitate to call your office or recommend your law services to a friend in need.”
“Thank you, thank you, thank you! I couldn’t be happier with all the hard work your office has done for me. I feel throughout the whole process I was kept informed, and my questions were always answered completely. The calls have stopped, I no longer have a mountain of junk bills piling up, and I owe it all to Lemberg Law.”
“I found your website. I filled out the information and much to my surprise received a call back within the hour. She listened intently and addressed each one of my concerns. She immediately forwarded me an email and advised I would not be charged for services rendered. She made me feel confident and assured, and that someone was in my corner.”
Can You Help Me Delete Valentine & Kebartas – V&K from My Credit Report?
Chances are good that we can help. Call us today and we’ll explain.
Share your story
Have you had a bad experience with this agency’s debt collectors? Sound off and share your experience with other visitors in the comment box below.
About the Author:
Sergei Lemberg is a lawyer whose practice focuses on consumer law, class actions and personal injury litigation. He has been repeatedly recognized as the “most active consumer attorney” in the country. In 2020, Mr. Lemberg represented Noah Duguid in the United States Supreme Court in the case entitled Duguid v. Facebook. He is the author of Defanging Debt Collectors, a book that teaches consumers how to battle debt collectors and win.