Fighting for Justice. Winning for You.
No Retainers. No Hassles. Just Results.
Class action lawsuits are filed on behalf of a group of people who were harmed in a similar way by a company’s violation of the law. In a class action, Lemberg & Associates works on behalf of the group, fighting to get consumers fair compensation for the damages they’ve suffered, as well as punitive damages for the company’s illegal behavior.
Lemberg & Associates is currently working on a number of class action lawsuits. If your experience is similar to the situations outlined below, please contact our office immediately.
Evon v. Law Offices of Sidney Mickell: If you’re a California resident and you received a debt collection letter from the Law Offices of Sidney Mickell at your place of employment, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Zimmerman v. Portfolio Recovery Associates: If you live in New York and have received a letter on Portfolio Recovery Litigation Department letterhead that threatened a lawsuit if you didn’t pay the debt or make payment arrangements within 14 days, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Butto and Houser v. Collecto: Have you received a debt collection letter from Collecto that added collection fees to the amount owed? If so, you may qualify to be a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Bright v. Asset Acceptance, LLC: If you live in New Jersey and received a debt collection call from 443-550-7962 where your caller ID said, “Warranty Service, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Garcia v. Receivables Performance Management: Have you received robocalls on your cell phone from the debt collector Receivables Performance Management? If so, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Rutigliano v. Convergent Outsourcing: Have you received robocalls on your cell phone from the debt collector Convergent Outsourcing (ER Solutions)? See if you qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Scott v. Westlake Financial Services: Have you received calls on your cell phone from the debt collector Westlake Financial Services? If so, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Weingarten v. Colony Brands, Inc.: Have you received robocalls on your cell phone from The Swiss Colony? If so, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Pagan v. Kohl’s Department Stores: Have you received automated, prerecorded calls (robocalls) to your cell phone from Kohl’s? If so, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Beard v. Santander Consumer USA and Triad Financial Corporation: Was your vehicle repossessed or were you charged more than 6% interest on your car loan while you were an active duty servicemember? If so, you might qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Seekamp v. Fuccillo Automotive Group: Did Fuccillo Hyundai in Schenectady sell you a service to etch your Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) onto your car window? You may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study.
Barsukova v. Macy’s Inc.: Did you purchase jewelry from Macy’s labeled and sold as “gold” or “fine gold” that was in fact gold-plated silver or sterling silver? If so, you may qualify as a plaintiff. Read the full case study